A friend recently posted a link Bill O’Reilly’s article entitled “Computing America” on his facebook status. The articles closing line: “Succeeding in the real world requires a lot more skill and determination than flipping a switch.” http://townhall.com/columnists/BillOReilly/2009/01/31/computing_america
After my friend posted the link a number were quick to point out how silly a lot of what Mr. O’Reilly is saying. For example, a Playstation 3 has a “modest” number of transistors or ‘switches’—around 234 million.* “So yeah,” one of our friends mentioned, “it does take a bit more than flipping A switch.” Mostly though, it seems everyone wrote it off. Yet another example of Mr. O’Reilly fomenting FUD (Fear/Uncertainly/Doubt) at the easiest of targets: ‘protecting our children.’

Picking apart Mr. O’Reilly’s verbiage is easy enough though and the fact is many share his fears.
Taking a step back from the kids, this never-ending fear of how technology is going to ruin society is getting a bit old though. As the Dead sang, “the same old story that’s always been told.”
Technology, especially laced with the arts— has been scaring the heck out of people for a long time . From the pope digging up the grave of the guy who first translated the Bible into plain English in order to crush and scatter his bones to those who devoted their lives to saving our children from comic books of all things.
Funny thing is, in the end and as a whole– things always get better. When we make it easier for people to exchange and access information we’re always better for it. Tangibly our economy grows and intangibly, so does our culture. Inevitably there is abuse, but the isolated scary examples are either forgotten or laughed away as something silly old people used to bother their kids about.
The irony of this c/Conservative (big and little ‘c’) concern is the similar fear of the very technology that allows Mr. O’Reilly to be “Bill O’Reilly” on a 24 hour news network in the first place. Of course, a threat to journalistic integrity is quite the call to action as a threat to ‘the children.’
Either way, all this fearin’ misses the point. Advances in technology, almost by definition, shatter entrenched powers into fragments for new players to fight over. That, in case if it wasn’t obvious, is why the Pope had his tiara in a twist. And frankly Mr. O’Reilly, you yourself are quite the case-in-point about just how ‘American’ that is.
Ask the Bush Administration about the resulting future of governance. Specifically, on the online community surrounding the liberal site, TalkingPointsMemo.com. Mere hours after the Justice Department released thousands of pages of documents regarding the alleged political influence in the firings of US Attorneys, the community had sifted through the documents and posted potentially damning details to the site. (Thanks to “Crowdsourcing” by Jeff Howe for bringing that to my attention!) Certainly, examples to the dismay of the current administration will come in due time as well.
Haven’t we learned that the next generation is only going to giggle at the fear mongering? Specific security concerns aside (protecting children on social networking sites for example), are we really so afraid of ourselves? Is humanity really just waiting for the next advance to take our dirty work to the max? Are we really just a bunch of evildoers held back by lack of technology?
Or maybe… whatever we invent– just becomes what we use it for
It’s just a bit foolish is to think the new technology can come cleanly, without crimes and misuse. It’s patently reactionary, however, to think that you– just by having come into being without it– are in a position to tell us what’s best.
Of course there are downsides, but scaring people so you can feel good about protecting us from ourselves… you’re still tied up the in cave yelling at shadows.
It’s not a sword if it doesn’t cut both ways.
-Dylan out
* http://tinyurl.com/dexe7k
~
Dylan A. Tredrea
Managing Director
Creo Ludus Entertainment, LLC
www.creoludus.com